Objectives:
- Disorders of the prostate
- Inflammation
- Hyperplasia
- Adenocarcinoma
- Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Staging, Prognosis
Axial specimen of prostate; urethra runs through it
Inflammation of the Prostate
- Acute prostatitis: usually associated with urinary tract infection
- Fever, perineal pain, dysuria
- Chronic prostatitis – may be bacterial or abacterial – chronic inflammatory cells
- Granulomatous prostatitis – rare.
- May be ass. with BCG therapy for urothelial carcinoma
Hyperplasia
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia(BPH) |
|
|
|
Pathogenesis
(assume production of DHT is constant)
- Increase in Androgen receptors in cells
- Stimulates production of growth factors (prostate)
- Prostate cells proliferate
- Tumor cell formed
Histology (of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia)
Location:
Periurethral glands: – (L) & (R) sides (“lateral lobes”) – Behind urethra (“median lobe”) Anatomically the central zone is involved |
Features:
|
Prostate tumour: Histology Gross:
Clinical Presentation (of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia)
|
|
Prostatic Carcinoma
|
Commonest malignancy in men
Age dependent; – (uncommon <40, 10% in 50s, 70% in 70s) Race: Common in African Americans, African Caribbeans; “Western” populations in general Rare in Asian poplns |
Risk Factors:
|
Others:
|
Prognosis:
Confined to prostate: 10 years~95% Lymph node +: 10 years=40% |
Staging
T1: clinically inapparent tumour – not detected by palpation or imaging T2: tumour confined to prostate T3: extraprostatic extension +/- SV invasion T4: invades adjacent structure other than SV eg rectum or bladder neck |
Metastatic Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: spread (TNM)
- Direct
- Perineural (cancer spreading to the space surrounding a nerve)
- Lymphatic
- Haematogenous
- Bone:Osteosclerotic
Absence of Basal Cells in PCA
|
Perineural Invasion
|
Malignant
|
Grading (Prostatic Adenocarcinoma)
Donald Gleason: 1966 Minneapolis VA Hospital
- Prostatic adenocarcinoma tends to be multifocal and heterogenous
- More than 1 architectural pattern is usually observed
- Gleason score is the sum of the 2 most common architectural patterns
GLEASON GRADE AND SCORE The Gleason grading system has stood the test of time
Gleason grade is based only on the architectural pattern (grades 1 to 5)
Remains one of the most important predictors of outcome in multivariate and univariate analyses |
Immunohistochemistry
- High MW Cytokeratins (CK 903, p63, 34BE12)
- marker for basal cells: invasive carcinoma lacks basal cells
- AMACR (p504s): alpha methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (a serine protease)
- Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA): only if there is doubt about the diagnosis
- Ki67 – not helpful
Prognosis
Three factors are important in predicting prognosis and are combined in clinical nomograms to predict outcome:
- Gleason score
- Clinical stage (based on DRE and/or imaging
-
- Serum PSA at diagnosis (Prostate Specific Antigen)
- Screening (somewhat controversial)
- Monitoring response to therapy
- Prediction of outcome
- Detection of recurrences
- PSA screening has led to an increase in the detection of small volume, early cancers
- The incidence of prostatic cancer may therefore be “higher” in countries where serum PSA testing is widely available
- Caution must be used in interpreting serum PSA values
- A level above 4ng/ml is considered “abnormal” in many centres
- However, this is not specific for cancer – elevation of PSA can occur in infection, inflammation, following surgical procedures, even ejaculation
- It increases with age and with BPH
- 4-10 ng/ml is a “grey-zone”
- Serum PSA at diagnosis (Prostate Specific Antigen)
PSA (determining significance)
Consider:
-
-
- PSA velocity – rate of rise on repeat testing
- PSA density – ratio of serum PSA to gland volume by imaging
-
- Free and bound PSA – lower free PSA ass. with higher risk of cancer
- Age-specific reference ranges
-
Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN)
“In situ neoplasia”
Cellular atypia within pre-existing prostatic ducts & glands with cytologic features mimicking adenocarcinoma, but without stromal invasion
Because PIN satisfies almost all the requirements for a premalignant condition, high-grade PIN (HGPIN) is widely accepted as a precursor to prostate cancer. (Adenocarcinoma)
→ Cancer on follow-up biopsy: 16 – 20%
-
-
- High Grade PIN (HGPIN) is reproducible
- Low grade PIN lacks inter-observer agreement
-
Atypical Small Acinar Proliferation (ASAP)
|
“Insignificant tumour”
50% chance of tumour volume <0.5cc at time of diagnosis |
“Insignificant tumour”
|
Prostatic adenocarcinoma
Tumour Grade Groups based on prognosis
|